January 18, 2019, 05:18:00 AM

Author Topic: 2019 Draft and beyond  (Read 2838 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline PackerJoe

  • All Pro
  • ****
  • Posts: 360
  • Karma: +12/-7
Re: 2019 Draft and beyond
« Reply #15 on: December 17, 2018, 01:00:23 PM »
So folks on the board think Perry is worth keeping.  He has played less than 15 games over the past three years!  He has averaged one tackle a game!  One tackle a game! You think he is good!  Again, the Packers tend to keep lousy, untalented, bums around and get rid of folks like Hayward, not an all pro, Hyde, an all pro, Tretter will be all pro this year.  he's making $750,000.00 a game for being a non-performing, non-showing up, non-existing resource on this team.  I have heard folks say, yeah but he holds the edge!  How many sacks has he had the last three years?  How many did he have before the big contract?  I understand the cap concerns, why didn't we get rid of him sooner and we had excess cap space!!!!  Keeping him around gives us the double whammy of a no talent, non-producing rusher who cash straps us!!!

Offline The GM

  • HOF Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2476
  • Karma: +36/-1
Re: 2019 Draft and beyond
« Reply #16 on: December 17, 2018, 08:12:03 PM »
So folks on the board think Perry is worth keeping.  He has played less than 15 games over the past three years!  He has averaged one tackle a game!  One tackle a game! You think he is good!  Again, the Packers tend to keep lousy, untalented, bums around and get rid of folks like Hayward, not an all pro, Hyde, an all pro, Tretter will be all pro this year.  he's making $750,000.00 a game for being a non-performing, non-showing up, non-existing resource on this team.  I have heard folks say, yeah but he holds the edge!  How many sacks has he had the last three years?  How many did he have before the big contract?  I understand the cap concerns, why didn't we get rid of him sooner and we had excess cap space!!!!  Keeping him around gives us the double whammy of a no talent, non-producing rusher who cash straps us!!!
Agree with this.  I dont think they can cut because of the cap hit, clearly one of the most boneheaded signings of the Thompson era.

Offline Shinesman

  • HOF Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2452
  • Karma: +5/-3
Re: 2019 Draft and beyond
« Reply #17 on: December 17, 2018, 10:42:48 PM »
So folks on the board think Perry is worth keeping.  He has played less than 15 games over the past three years!  He has averaged one tackle a game!  One tackle a game! You think he is good!  Again, the Packers tend to keep lousy, untalented, bums around and get rid of folks like Hayward, not an all pro, Hyde, an all pro, Tretter will be all pro this year.  he's making $750,000.00 a game for being a non-performing, non-showing up, non-existing resource on this team.  I have heard folks say, yeah but he holds the edge!  How many sacks has he had the last three years?  How many did he have before the big contract?  I understand the cap concerns, why didn't we get rid of him sooner and we had excess cap space!!!!  Keeping him around gives us the double whammy of a no talent, non-producing rusher who cash straps us!!!
Agree with this.  I dont think they can cut because of the cap hit, clearly one of the most boneheaded signings of the Thompson era.

The theme of the Thompson era was to draft guys and play them at a different position. Probably a big reason for poor performance. Randall comes to mind, he played safety in college. Rarely can a safety convert to CB, a CB must have quickness in space and acceleration as a top attribute. Safeties are normally safeties because their acceleration and change of direction is not sufficient to be a CB. We trade him to Cleveland, and he is playing pretty well, at his natural position I believe.

We always draft tackles and try to make them guards. Doesnt end up working very much. Why not draft a damn guard to play guard? And stop resigning guys who have never played a whole season and have recurring issues, and have clearly been overrated most of their career (Bulaga).

We drafted Sherrod, who was known to  be a project. You dont draft projects in the first round, unless by project, you mean someone who is so athletically superior that improving their skills means making them all-pros in a year or two. Someone like Clowney.

Perry, a natural 3-4 DE, forced to play OLB..... again, one season of decent production.

Rollins, a guy who had I think 2 years of playing football?  Maybe you take him in round 5-7, not round 2.

We took an often injured guy in college. He has yet to finish a whole season for us.

We draft plodding ILBs like Jake Ryan or that kid from ASU a few years back, then wonder why they cant perform in a defense that requires faster middle linebackers to track the ball carrier and take on blockers at the line in pursuit.

We flat out ignored the most important position in our defense for years!!!! What else do you need to know about our management other than that.

I remember how many people here used to scoff at the thought of drafting the actual player you needed instead of a guy who could play two spots in college. But if the guy is average at two spots in college, hes really nothing in the NFL. Versatility means nothing if you get owned by all the different opposition you have to take on at those positions. This is the price you pay for drafting like you want permanent backups instead of impactful players.

This front office has a lot of work to do, to undo the mistakes in the past 5 years. We just signed a new scouting director if the rumors are true, so maybe our draft board will finally be stacked properly. I'm hoping for the best, but prepared for the worst.
"Tradition! Just because we've always done it that way, doesn't mean that it isn't incredibly stupid."

Offline dannobanano

  • HOF Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4733
  • Karma: +25/-2
Re: 2019 Draft and beyond
« Reply #18 on: December 18, 2018, 06:03:14 AM »

The theme of the Thompson era was to draft guys and play them at a different position. Probably a big reason for poor performance. Randall comes to mind, he played safety in college. Rarely can a safety convert to CB, a CB must have quickness in space and acceleration as a top attribute. Safeties are normally safeties because their acceleration and change of direction is not sufficient to be a CB. We trade him to Cleveland, and he is playing pretty well, at his natural position I believe.

We always draft tackles and try to make them guards. Doesnt end up working very much. Why not draft a damn guard to play guard? And stop resigning guys who have never played a whole season and have recurring issues, and have clearly been overrated most of their career (Bulaga).

We drafted Sherrod, who was known to  be a project. You dont draft projects in the first round, unless by project, you mean someone who is so athletically superior that improving their skills means making them all-pros in a year or two. Someone like Clowney.

Perry, a natural 3-4 DE, forced to play OLB..... again, one season of decent production.

Rollins, a guy who had I think 2 years of playing football?  Maybe you take him in round 5-7, not round 2.

We took an often injured guy in college. He has yet to finish a whole season for us.

We draft plodding ILBs like Jake Ryan or that kid from ASU a few years back, then wonder why they cant perform in a defense that requires faster middle linebackers to track the ball carrier and take on blockers at the line in pursuit.

We flat out ignored the most important position in our defense for years!!!! What else do you need to know about our management other than that.

I remember how many people here used to scoff at the thought of drafting the actual player you needed instead of a guy who could play two spots in college. But if the guy is average at two spots in college, hes really nothing in the NFL. Versatility means nothing if you get owned by all the different opposition you have to take on at those positions. This is the price you pay for drafting like you want permanent backups instead of impactful players.

This front office has a lot of work to do, to undo the mistakes in the past 5 years. We just signed a new scouting director if the rumors are true, so maybe our draft board will finally be stacked properly. I'm hoping for the best, but prepared for the worst.

you made a couple of good points with Randall playing CB rather than Safety and the slowness of Ryan. Bradford was an edge rusher who didn't cut it at edge, so they tried him at ILB and that failed as well............just a failed pick in general.

But you went off the rails with your comment about converting OT's into G's.

At draft time there are numerous OT's that are projected at G in the NFL because they lack the proper dimensions/size and athleticism to make it as OT's in the NFL. Many of them convert to G and have successful NFL careers and GB has done that with several over the years. Darryn Colledge, Josh Sitton, and TJ Lang were all OT's in college but moved to G in the NFL. Currently Lane Taylor is another example of converting a college OT to G in the NFL. He had a down year this year, but he was also nagged by several injuries. I hope he bounces back next year.

You could have added converting WR's to TE's as well, and cited Bostick as an example........but I digress.

Your argument was valid until you went a bridge too far on converting OT's to G's. Most teams do it every year.

Offline Shinesman

  • HOF Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2452
  • Karma: +5/-3
Re: 2019 Draft and beyond
« Reply #19 on: December 18, 2018, 02:06:34 PM »

The theme of the Thompson era was to draft guys and play them at a different position. Probably a big reason for poor performance. Randall comes to mind, he played safety in college. Rarely can a safety convert to CB, a CB must have quickness in space and acceleration as a top attribute. Safeties are normally safeties because their acceleration and change of direction is not sufficient to be a CB. We trade him to Cleveland, and he is playing pretty well, at his natural position I believe.

We always draft tackles and try to make them guards. Doesnt end up working very much. Why not draft a damn guard to play guard? And stop resigning guys who have never played a whole season and have recurring issues, and have clearly been overrated most of their career (Bulaga).

We drafted Sherrod, who was known to  be a project. You dont draft projects in the first round, unless by project, you mean someone who is so athletically superior that improving their skills means making them all-pros in a year or two. Someone like Clowney.

Perry, a natural 3-4 DE, forced to play OLB..... again, one season of decent production.

Rollins, a guy who had I think 2 years of playing football?  Maybe you take him in round 5-7, not round 2.

We took an often injured guy in college. He has yet to finish a whole season for us.

We draft plodding ILBs like Jake Ryan or that kid from ASU a few years back, then wonder why they cant perform in a defense that requires faster middle linebackers to track the ball carrier and take on blockers at the line in pursuit.

We flat out ignored the most important position in our defense for years!!!! What else do you need to know about our management other than that.

I remember how many people here used to scoff at the thought of drafting the actual player you needed instead of a guy who could play two spots in college. But if the guy is average at two spots in college, hes really nothing in the NFL. Versatility means nothing if you get owned by all the different opposition you have to take on at those positions. This is the price you pay for drafting like you want permanent backups instead of impactful players.

This front office has a lot of work to do, to undo the mistakes in the past 5 years. We just signed a new scouting director if the rumors are true, so maybe our draft board will finally be stacked properly. I'm hoping for the best, but prepared for the worst.

you made a couple of good points with Randall playing CB rather than Safety and the slowness of Ryan. Bradford was an edge rusher who didn't cut it at edge, so they tried him at ILB and that failed as well............just a failed pick in general.

But you went off the rails with your comment about converting OT's into G's.

At draft time there are numerous OT's that are projected at G in the NFL because they lack the proper dimensions/size and athleticism to make it as OT's in the NFL. Many of them convert to G and have successful NFL careers and GB has done that with several over the years. Darryn Colledge, Josh Sitton, and TJ Lang were all OT's in college but moved to G in the NFL. Currently Lane Taylor is another example of converting a college OT to G in the NFL. He had a down year this year, but he was also nagged by several injuries. I hope he bounces back next year.

You could have added converting WR's to TE's as well, and cited Bostick as an example........but I digress.

Your argument was valid until you went a bridge too far on converting OT's to G's. Most teams do it every year.

Guards are roadgraders, if someone hasn't been playing that way, it's tough to adjust to it at the highest level of competition. I agree it's an easier transition than most others but it's still something of a higher gamble than drafting a guard.

I thought they drafted Bradford with the intention of moving him inside because he lacked size. I didnt even touch on Thornton, who was a complete reach.
"Tradition! Just because we've always done it that way, doesn't mean that it isn't incredibly stupid."

Online marklawrence

  • Administrator
  • HOF Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2972
  • Karma: +37/-9
Re: 2019 Draft and beyond
« Reply #20 on: December 18, 2018, 06:27:10 PM »
Guards are road graders unless your ol does zone blocking, in which case sideways movement is critical. And that's why we convert ot to g.
I'm a Deplorable Freeloader, clinging to my Guns and Bible! And Proud of it!

Offline Shinesman

  • HOF Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2452
  • Karma: +5/-3
Re: 2019 Draft and beyond
« Reply #21 on: December 18, 2018, 09:39:41 PM »
Guards are road graders unless your ol does zone blocking, in which case sideways movement is critical. And that's why we convert ot to g.

Well I guess we are bad at converting. Anyone running not named Aaron Jones had a tough time finding openings consistently.
"Tradition! Just because we've always done it that way, doesn't mean that it isn't incredibly stupid."

Offline PackerJoe

  • All Pro
  • ****
  • Posts: 360
  • Karma: +12/-7
Re: 2019 Draft and beyond
« Reply #22 on: December 24, 2018, 07:27:50 AM »
As of this am, we have the 14th pick and NO.  So, I don't wish ill will on them, but I'm kind of hoping they lose their first playoff game.  That will give us another pick in the 20-24 range.

Offline dannobanano

  • HOF Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4733
  • Karma: +25/-2
Re: 2019 Draft and beyond
« Reply #23 on: December 24, 2018, 07:44:44 AM »
As of this am, we have the 14th pick and NO.  So, I don't wish ill will on them, but I'm kind of hoping they lose their first playoff game.  That will give us another pick in the 20-24 range.

I read this morning that #25 is the best to hope for from Saints pick.


I stand corrected. #27 is best to hope for.

https://packerswire.usatoday.com/2018/12/23/reassessing-packers-draft-pick-positioning-after-win-over-jets/
« Last Edit: December 24, 2018, 07:47:23 AM by dannobanano »